Sunday, July 2, 2006
Press Release: The President Is Not Above The Law.
Washington, DC. The President is not above the law. However, according to top Constitutional law scholars David Addington and John Yoo, the law is below the President.
This is the kind of distinction, a fake one, that is obvious to Conservatives, but that Liberals, with their illogical insistance on “the facts” never understand.
In the United States Of America, we have a system of checks and balances. Usually lobbyists write checks, which increase campaign fund balances.
Think about those “totalitarian” states. A guy like Saddam Houssein, or Assad of Syria, or Stalin, or that guy in Korea; that guy makes the law. No checks. No balances. Here in the United States, which is a democratic republic, a people's republic, the Congress makes the law. The President enforces the law. Now today there’s a crisis, so the President has to choose which laws to enforce, how to enforce them, and who they apply to. And when he has to act fast the President makes the law.
And remember, in those “totalitarian” states the presidents are never elected. President Bush was elected with a clear majority. In 2000 and again in 2004. Not November, 2000 – that one went to Al Gore, but later, in December, 2000. And earlier, in the Republican Party Primaries and Republican Convention. So then in December the Supreme Court voted 5 to 4 to make George W. Bush the 43rd President. It may only have been one vote, but it was more than 10% of the voters.
And Bush was elected again, in 2004. It was close – it almost went to Kerry, but patriots in Ohio took action. They didn’t just vote – multiple times – they got dead people to vote, and they stopped college students, liberals and “people of color” from voting. Those kinds of people – young, poor, inexperienced, liberals; they don’t know enough to vote for the right guy. Voting for them is not a right or a privilege. It would be an exercise in futility. But not allowing them to vote - it gives them something to look forward to, to strive for.
This is the kind of democracy we live in. The Supreme Court elects the President. The Congress agrees with the President, especially in times of war, when as ‘Commander in Chief’ the President wields all the power he needs to get the job done. The Press writes what it’s told to write, what it’s paid to write, or what it makes up. And the people go about their business, try to make ends meet and stay out of trouble.
And that’s why we are winning the war on Terrorism. We toppled Saddam Houssein three years ago. The War in Iraq today is just a mopping up operation. We have bin Laden cornered – he is somewhere south of the North Pole and north of the South Pole, probably on land.
Even the glaciers are on the run.
Saturday, July 1, 2006
Machiavelli Would Sell the Ports
And granted, neither Presidents Roosevelt nor Truman would have sold the
It is actually a very ingenious plan, hatched by covert operatives in the White House basement – the same people who brought us the Watergate break-in and the Iran Contra affair. This is the best thing for the country since Jack Abramoff’s courageous work on behalf of the American people, and this plan has several goals.
First it distracts Americans from the silly incident in which the Vice President shot that lawyer. (And is it really so bad to shoot a lawyer? Doesn’t everyone want to shoot a lawyer? At least sometimes? Isn’t it practically guaranteed by the Second Amendment – does not the Right to Bear Arms imply the right to Shoot Lawyers?)
It also lulls the left-wing “humorists” like Jay Leno, David Letterman, Jon Stewart with the sense that they can take it easy. Why make stuff up – the facts are even better. The White House, eyeing the success of “Saturday Night Live”, “Weekend Update,” “The Daily Show,” and the “Dave Chappell Show” and its own poor performance in the “Katrina Show” aims to improve its ratings.
In addition, it gives the Democrats a false sense of security that they will recapture the House and Senate in the mid-term elections, and the White House in 2008.
And remember, it’s not a security risk if more than $1 billion will change hands, and $6.8 billion will finance a lot of campaigns.
Besides,
But most important, and this is pure Machiavellian genius, selling these ports for $6.8 Billion will give us a lot of money – enough to finance the war in Iraq for about a month, which will be sufficient to end the war, after all, didn’t the President declare the mission accomplished and major fighting ended back in May, 2003, almost 3 years ago? So today, 3 years later, it must really be almost over, little more than a mopping up operation. So selling these ports to a company headquartered in a country where they launder money for Al Qaeda Terrorists will lay a trap for Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. The next time they try something we’ll know where they are!
Press Release: Martyrs Insurance Expanded With Due Process Insurance Unit
Press Release: Martyrs Insurance Expanded with Due Process Insurance Unit Formed.
For Immediate Release. July 4, 2006.
So parents, siblings, dependents and spouses of Americans killed or imprisioned while defending the freedom of Palestinians, or their weapons caches are also eligible for compensation, once they embrace the peaceful ways of Allah, after they convert.
According to AAAQMI, payments will not be made to those “Foolish Incompetents” who are actually convicted of planning terrorist activities. According to Ali Allah Akbar Mohhamed, spokesman for AAQMI, “First of all, praise be Allah, when they are caught it means they can no longer fight for jihad. It means their martyrdom must wait until they are released from prison. Even if, Praise Allah, the event they were planning does occur, it occurs without the continued efforts and participation of the wanna-be. When he dies he will not get his virgins. This insurance benefit is for martyrs and Wahabis, not wannabis. Second, getting caught and getting convicted is very bad for Jihad. It gives us a bad name. Think about it. It makes us look stupid. After Sept. 11
* This is a work of satire. Any resemblance to actual events that may or may not be reported in the news is purely tragic.